Researched profile. The figures here are modelled by us from public information, published with the sources they were drawn from. How we research.
Nobody has priced this business. What follows is a model — a base multiple moved by what the public record supports — applied to trailing-twelve profit, and the franchise-titled sets take the largest single deduction on it.
Indicative valuation: $376,963 — 1.45× a trailing-twelve net profit of $259,975, scored as of Sep 2026. Trailing-twelve net profit at a modelled multiple, with the franchise-titled sets scored as an open IP issue. WOODLANDS USA on Amazon US only.
The IP risk enters through the model’s own input for it: an unresolved account or IP issue, which takes 0.8 off the multiple — more than any other single factor on the board. Three of the bamboo sets are titled for film franchises and one carries franchise imagery, with no licence shown on any of them; no complaint against them is on the public record, so this is a reading of the listings, not of a dispute. It matters because of how much rests on them: 56% of December 2025, 21% of September 2026 and about a third of the trailing year’s revenue — the year this multiple is applied to. Without that input the same profit would be valued at well over half as much again.
Past the IP question the record is thin and young: under two years of trading, a standard bamboo set factories list as stock, all of it on Amazon US, more than a quarter of the trailing year in one December, and seller feedback just under the line the model rewards. Against that, the review pools and the 4.6-star rating are real, and the brand store is enrolled in Brand Registry. Sourcing, catalogue shape, the differentiation level and the IP issue itself are inferences from the public record, and they are the first things to put to the owner — the licence question above all.