Researched profile. The figures here are modelled by us from public information, published with the sources they were drawn from. How we research.
Read Sep 2026. Figures here are a reading taken then, not a live feed.
Their site links four social accounts, and on Amazon the demand arrives already typing the brand’s name.
Follower counts and site traffic were not read for this profile, so the chips above carry no audience figure. What was read is Amazon search. On “wet noses dog treats”, 24 of the first page’s organic results carry the brand’s name; across three generic searches, one Wet Noses listing appears once, at position 48 on “organic dog treats”.
| Search | Sponsored slots theirs | Organic results with the name | Best organic position |
|---|---|---|---|
| wet noses dog treats | 6 of 12 | 24 | #5 |
| organic dog treats | 0 of 12 | 1 | #48 |
| grain free dog treats | 0 of 12 | 0 | — |
| human grade dog treats | 0 of 12 | 0 | — |
Read 15 September 2026 in Chrome with delivery set to Monroe, Washington, 60 results a page. Amazon localises search to whoever is looking, so these positions describe that reader on that day. A few organic results on the brand term are listings outside the brand’s own storefront.
Nothing public says where that branded demand comes from — the distributor’s shelves, the brand’s own site or its socials — because none of them publishes a number.