Spite House Games — Margin breakdown

Researched profile. The figures here are modelled by us from public information, published with the sources they were drawn from. How we research.

Margin breakdown

Every cent of an $8.87 order, from the printer to what is left — and the largest single line is not the product, it is moving it.

Four printers in China quote this deck publicly, at minimums a first order could actually meet. The spread is wide because “a deck of cards” covers a lot of paper stocks and box finishes, so the figure used below sits mid-range rather than at the floor.

COGS — what the deck costs to make

QuoteRegionMOQLead timeUnit cost
Guangzhou Miyi Printing Co., LtdGuangdong, CN500 setsnot quoted$0.50–1.00 / deck
Shenzhen Gold Sun Color Printing Co., LtdGuangdong, CN300 piecesnot quoted$0.70–3.00 / deck
Guangzhou Zhongtian Paper Product Co., LtdGuangdong, CN500 piecesnot quoted$0.12–0.99 / deck
Tianjin Caile Printing Co., LtdTianjin, CN100 piecesnot quoted$0.01–0.55 / deck
Freight and inbound — a placeholder, not a quoteCN → US$0.50 / deck

The freight line is the one figure here that nobody published. It is our placeholder, and the first thing to replace with a real quote — at these prices it moves the margin by more than the printing does.

The shape of it is unusual: on most products the factory is the largest cost and the marketplace takes a slice. Here it is the other way round. Fulfilment alone is more than twice the cost of goods, because Amazon prices moving a box by its size and weight rather than by what is in it — and a deck of cards costs about the same to pick, pack and ship whether it sells for $6.97 or $19.99.

Which is the argument for the $12.99 and $19.99 re-cuts. The same object, the same fulfilment fee, at nearly three times the price — every dollar of that increase lands almost entirely in margin.

Spite House Games overview · All ideas